Ultrasound Classification of Finger Pulp Blood Flow in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: To define a semiquantitative classification of finger pulp blood flow (FPBF) and to evaluate whether this classification could be used to assess FPBF in healthy controls and in systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. METHODS: Thirty controls and 86 SSc patients were consecutively included. A classification of FPBF including 5 grades (from grade 0 [no signal] to 4 [signal detected on the entire finger pulp, including the subepidermal vascular network]) was evaluated. This classification was explored in basal conditions and after hand baths in hot and cold water in controls. Its relevance was also assessed at room temperature in SSc patients. RESULTS: In controls, power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) of FPBF was improved after hot challenge (P = 0.024), whereas cold challenge decreased FPBF (P = 0.001). FPBF correlated with the vasodilation status assessed by the resistivity index of radial arteries (Spearman's correlation coefficient = -0.50, P = 0.0049). Grade 0 was more frequent in SSc patients than in controls (22.1% versus 3.3%; P < 0.05). In SSc patients, grade 0 was associated with severity markers of the digital vasculopathy such as digital ulcers (DUs) (current or past) (P < 0.05) or ulnar artery occlusion (P < 0.05). On the other hand, DUs were less frequent in patients with grade 4 (P < 0.05). A pathologic threshold of <2 (grade 0 or 1) was significantly associated with DUs (odds ratio 6.67 [95% confidence interval 2.31-19.21], P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: PDUS allowed a semiquantitative evaluation of FBPF in SSc patients and controls. Further studies are warranted to validate these results in independent SSc populations and to compare PDUS to existing tools assessing digital blood flow.

Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) in a liver transplant patient: are hypomagnesemia, tacrolimus or both guilty? A case-based literature review.

Calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) can be induced by a persistent hypomagnesemia. Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive treatment especially used in organ transplant, potentially inducer of hypomagnesemia by renal loss. A 53-year-old man, liver transplant 10 months earlier, developed an acute peripheral oligoarthritis of wrist, hip and elbow with fever, associated with acute low back pain. Synovial fluid was sterile, and revealed calcium pyrophosphate crystals. Spinal imaging showed inflammatory changes. Magnesium blood level was low at 0.51 mmol/l, with high fractional excretion in favor of renal loss. Tacrolimus was changed for everolimus, proton pump inhibitor was stopped, and magnesium oral supplementation was started. After 8 months follow-up and slow prednisone tapering, he did not relapse pain. Persistent hypomagnesemia is a rare secondary cause of CPPD. In this entity, drug liability should be investigated such as tacrolimus in organ transplant patient.

Hand ultrasound for the diagnosis of scleroderma: a scoring strategy including US items and items from the EULAR/ACR classification.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic value of hand ultrasound (US) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to explore its relevance within a combined diagnostic approach. METHODS: 224 patients with suspected SSc were consecutively included. They all had US evaluation assessing the presence of fibrotic tenosynovitis (fibrotic TS) and ulnar artery occlusion (UAO). The final diagnosis of SSc was based on the clinical evaluation of a board of experts independently of any pre-established classification criteria. RESULTS: 166 patients were finally diagnosed as SSc according to the experts as reference standard. 62 SSc and 8 non-SSc patients had UAO (uni or bilateral) (p=0.001). 23 SSc patients and 1 non-SSc patient had US fibrotic TS (p=0.007). A US SSc-pattern (presence of UAO and/or fibrotic TS) was reported in 73 SSc patients and 9 non-SSc patients (p<0.001). UAO had an area under ROC curve (AUC) for the diagnosis of SSc of 0.618 (95%CI 0.539- 0.697); with Se=0.373 (0.304-0.449) and Sp=0.862 (0.751-0.928). Fibrotic TS had an AUC of 0.561 (0.480-0.643); with Se=0.139 (0.094-0.199) and Sp=0.983 (0.909-0.997). The US-SSc pattern had a AUC of 0.641 (0.563- 0.695), with Se=0.440 (0.367-0.516) and Sp=0.845 (0.731-0.916). A scoring system including these US parameters and items from ACR/EULAR classification criteria had an AUC of 0.979 (0.962-0.996)) and allows the substitution of capillaroscopy by US parameters with similar performances. CONCLUSIONS: The use of hand US parameters may help to refine the diagnostic strategy of SSc and their inclusion in a combined diagnostic approach could be discussed.

The nosology of systemic sclerosis: how lessons from the past offer new challenges in reframing an idiopathic rheumatological disorder.

Systemic sclerosis is a rare connective tissue disease characterised by a wide range of clinical manifestations. Compared with previous sets of criteria, the 2013 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification of systemic sclerosis encompasses a broader and more relevant spectrum of the condition. Nonetheless, clinical and prognostic heterogeneity persists among patients fulfilling these criteria. The next task in the classification of systemic sclerosis is the development of new subset criteria that can successfully identify subgroups of patients with distinct prognostic or pathophysiological features. In this Viewpoint we describe the history of systemic sclerosis over the past century with the objective of highlighting the effect of previous nosological debates on efforts to understand and manage this disorder. Rather than seeking to present a systematic review of possible subgrouping for systemic sclerosis in relation to prognosis, we aim to clarify how nosological considerations have influenced our understanding of the cause and prognosis of this so-called idiopathic rheumatological disorder and how aetiological, prognostic, and pathophysiological hypotheses have helped to describe clusters within the disease. By reflecting on past nosological debates and endeavours, we identify challenges for the current initiative to develop a new subgrouping of systemic sclerosis.